Advanced Search

Klassen v Ember Resources Inc - 2023 ABLPRT 904399 - 2023-07-06

[2] On July 15, 2022, a Notice and Demand for Payment was sent to Ember Resources Inc. (“Ember”) demanding payment in the amount of $3,047.25.   [...]  [3] On September 29, 2022, a second Notice and Demand for Payment was sent to Ember demanding payment in the amount of $3,309.75. [4] On February 17, 2023, Ember wrote to the Tribunal attaching a letter from Ember to the Applicants dated December 1, 2022 regarding outstanding payments (“Ember Payment Letter”).   [...]  In the Ember Rent Letter, Ember admits that it is the holder of the Surface Lease for the Site.

Klassen v Ember Resources Inc - 2023 ABLPRT 904393 - 2023-07-06

[2] On July 15, 2022, a Notice and Demand for Payment was sent to Ember Resources Inc. (“Ember”) demanding payment in the amount of $2,903.25.   [...]  [3] On September 29, 2022, a second Notice and Demand for Payment was sent to Ember demanding payment in the amount of $3,165.75. [4] On February 17, 2023, Ember wrote to the Tribunal attaching a letter from Ember to the Applicants dated December 1, 2022 regarding outstanding payments (“Ember Payment Letter”).   [...]  In the Ember Rent Letter, Ember admits that it is the holder of the Surface Lease for the Site.

Tonne v Ember Resources Inc - 2023 ABLPRT 904250 - 2023-07-05

The Tribunal granted Ember’s request, and Owen Law delivered Ember’s response to the Tribunal on November 10, 2021 (the “Ember Response”).   [...]  [4] In the Ember Response, Ember requested that the Tribunal reconsider its Notice and Demand for Payment pursuant to section 29 of the Act. Ember did not respond to the merits of the Applicant’s claim.   [...]  In the covering email from Ember’s counsel dated November 10, 2021, by which it transmitted the Ember Submission to the Tribunal it stated:

Schultz v Ember Resources Inc - 2022 ABLPRT 952 - 2022-04-20

[12] In this proceeding, there is no dispute that Ember is the Operator under section 36. Well License No. 0326644 is assigned to Ember.   [...]  Ember is actively producing the well. The Panel finds Ember is the Operator under section 36 of the Act.   [...]  Ember had the opportunity to include a fulsome response to the Application, including disputing anything in the Application Ember did not agree with, providing evidence to support Ember’s position, and any argument to support its position.

Schultz v Ember Resources Inc. - 2023 ABLPRT 901021 - 2023-03-01

Schultz v Ember Resources Inc., 2023 ABLPRT 901021, RC2021.1041 LAND AND PROPERTY RIGHTS   [...]  Schultz v Ember Resources Inc, 2022 ABLPRT 900459 Date: 2022-10-31 File No.:   [...]  AER Well License No. 0351348 for the Site is in the name of Ember Resources Inc. The Panel finds that Ember Resources Inc. is an operator under s. 36(1)(c) on November 8, 2020

Main v Ember Resources Inc - 2022 ABLPRT 1098 - 2022-06-02

Poffenroth v Ember Resources Inc., 2022 ABLPRT 30 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/jlmq0>, J & D Land Ltd. v Ember Resources Inc., 2022 ABLPRT 135 (CanLJD, <https://canlii.ca/t/jlw4t> George v Ember Resources Inc., 2022 ABLPRT 106 (CanLID, <https://canlii.ca/t/jlr8d>   [...]  AER Well Licence No. 0356045 for the Site is in the name of Ember Resources Inc. The Panel finds that Ember Resources Inc. is an operator under s. 36(1)(c) on September 13, 2020.   [...]  Ember Resources Inc. had the opportunity to include a fulsome response to the Application, including disputing anything in the Application Ember Resources Inc. did not agree with, providing evidence to support Ember Resources Inc.'s position, and any argument to support its position.

Glass v Ember Resources Inc. - 2024 ABLPRT 904081 - 2024-08-13

On February 16, 2021, Owen Law delivered Ember’s response to the Tribunal (the “Ember Response”). [3] In the Ember Response, Ember requested that the Tribunal reconsider its Notice and Demand for Payment pursuant to section 29 of the Act. Ember did not respond to the merits of the Applicant’s claim.   [...]  [57] Ember submits that the amount owing by Ember under this lease was not owing at the time the Notice was issued.   [...]  The Notice was predicated on a finding that there was money owing by Ember. This represents an error of fact which Ember submits affects the Notice.

Stevens v. Ember Resources Inc - 2025 ABLPRT 159 - 2025-03-26

Ms. Fisher made no mention of the payment by EMBER nor any suggestion that there was a difficulty in cashing the cheque from EMBER.   [...]  EMBER has not provided a copy of the Vesting Order to suggest otherwise.   [...]  Ms. Fisher made no mention of the payment by EMBER nor any suggestion that there was a difficulty in cashing the cheque from EMBER.

Allison v Ember Resources Inc. - 2024 ABLPRT 904367 - 2024-08-23

Allison v Ember Resources Inc., 2024 ABLPRT 904367, RC2021.1289 Citation: Date: File No: Order No.: Municipality:   [...]  [3] In a letter dated April 28, 2020, from Ember Resources Inc. (“Ember”) indicates that Ember considers the site to be an Abandoned Wellsite.   [...]  Ember argues that by not providing notice of the section 36 applications, before issuing the Demands, the Tribunal denied Ember any opportunity to make representations or submissions before issuing the against them.

Bennett v Ember Resources Ltd. - 2024 ABLPRT 906028 - 2024-11-14

Bennett v Ember Resources Ltd., 2024 ABLPRT 906028 Date: 2024-11-14 File No:   [...]  For Ember Resources Inc. Mr. Tom Owen, OWEN LAW DIRECTION TO PAY PURSUANT TO   [...]  Under “Error of Fact” EMBER suggest that the demand for was $2,166 and that the only lease that EMBER has “on this land” was based on annual compensation of “$4,100.00.”

Brietzke v Ember Resources Inc - 2023 ABLPRT 903630 - 2023-06-14

Brietzke v Ember Resources Inc, 2023 ABLPRT 903630 Date: 2023-06-14 File No.:   [...]  [2] By letters dated December 6, 2022, the Tribunal issued a Notice and Demand for Payment to Bumper Development Corporation Ltd. (Bumper) and Ember Resources Inc. (Ember). No response was received from Bumper or Ember to the Notice and Demand for Payments.   [...]  AER Well Licence No. 0361926 for the Site is in the name of Ember. The Panel finds that Ember is an operator under section 36(1)(c) on the Surface Lease 2020 and 2021 due dates.

Ember Resources Inc. v Webster - 2023 ABLPRT SR459 - 2023-08-18

[3] Ember’s legal counsel delivered Ember’s response to the Tribunal on August 26, 2021 (the “Ember Response”).   [...]  • The Notice and Demand for Payment was delivered to Ember on August 13, 2021. Ember provided the Ember Response less than two weeks later, on August 26, 2021.   [...]  The Ember Submission also makes unsupported statements about Ember’s ongoing ability to meet its obligations.

Richards v Ember Resources Inc - 2022 ABLPRT SR900558 - 2022-11-24

[13] In this proceeding, there is no dispute that Ember is the Operator under section 36. Well License No. 0351549 is assigned to Ember.   [...]  Ember is actively producing the well. The Panel finds Ember is the Operator under section 36 of the Act.   [...]  Ember had the opportunity to include a fulsome response to the Application, including disputing anything in the Application Ember did not agree with, providing evidence to support Ember’s position, and any argument to support its position.